5
likely select investments — such as luxury hotels rather than affordable housing — based mainly on
their expected financial return, not their social impact.
Indeed, in pitching to potential investors, former Trump White House Communications Director
Anthony Scaramucci characterized one of his investment firm’s projects in an opportunity zone in
Oakland as “building a swank, boutique hotel that’s going to create excessive economic rents.”
Similarly, Cadre, a New-York-based real estate investment firm, announced plans to invest only in a
subset of opportunity zones in metropolitan areas with “outsized future growth potential” — in
other words, in cities that are already expected to grow economically and likely don’t need help in
attracting investment.
Not surprisingly, then, analysts warn that the new tax break could accelerate
gentrification — and, hence, the dislocation of current residents — and create few jobs.
As noted, the law requires that opportunity zone businesses “derive” at least half of their income
from an “active business” in a zone. Neither the law nor the regulations, however, explain what that
means. Consider the following: A large, multinational software company that’s headquartered in
Silicon Valley locates a new subsidiary in an opportunity zone and moves a handful of its existing
software developers into the subsidiary, but it continues to employ most of its workers outside of
opportunity zones. The subsidiary earns income by licensing software that’s developed in part in the
opportunity zone back to the parent company in Silicon Valley, which then sub-licenses it to customers
around the world. Is the company’s resulting income “derived” from a business in the opportunity
zone? As Treasury develops additional regulations clarifying this and other ambiguities, it should do
so in ways that provide the greatest benefit for local residents.
Ambiguous, Arbitrary Rules Raise Questions of Tax Avoidance
Opportunity zones also bring the potential for loopholes that encourage tax sheltering and other
forms of tax avoidance. As a starting point, the proposed regulations let an investor get the full tax
break even if only 63 percent of the total capital that an opportunity zone fund invests flows to a
zone.
Beyond that, pure gaming could limit investment in opportunity zones even more. For instance,
there is a question about the extent to which a firm that relies on intangible property, such as
intellectual property — which is typical for a technology startup or pharmaceutical company — can
Ruth Simon and Richard Rubin, “New Hotel or Affordable Housing? Race Is On to Define ‘Opportunity Zones,’”
Wall Street Journal, July 13, 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-hotel-or-affordable-housing-race-is-on-to-define-
opportunity-zones-1531474200.
Noah Buhayar, “Scaramucci Pitches ‘Swank’ Hotel for Tax Cut Aimed at Poor Areas,” Bloomberg, December 12,
2018, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-12/scaramucci-pitches-swank-hotel-for-tax-cut-aimed-at-
poor-areas.
Charlie Anastasi, “Opportunity Zones: Moving from Reaction to Action,” Cadre,
https://cadre.com/insights/opportunity-zones-moving-from-reaction-to-action/.
Tatiana Kimbo and Richard Phillips, “How Opportunity Zones Benefit Investors and Promote Displacement,”
Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, August 10, 2018, https://itep.org/how-opportunity-zones-benefit-
investors-and-promote-displacement/.
See Richard Rubin, “New ‘Opportunity Zone’ Tax-Break Rules Offer Flexibility to Developers,” Wall Street Journal,
October 19, 2018, https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-opportunity-zone-tax-break-rules-offer-flexibility-to-developers-
1539948600.